• Services
      • Customer
        Strategy
      • Customer Management
      • Sales & Account Management
      • Trust Evaluation & Development
      • B2B Trust
      • Organisational
        Performance
      • Embedded Trust
      • Business Capabilities
      • Training and Development
      • Customer Centricity
  • Knowledge Centre
      • Blog
      • Publications
      • News
      • Insight Webcasts
  • Who we work for
  • Who we are
      • Our People
      • Partners
  • Contact us
  • Menu Menu
You are here: Home1 / Organisational Performance2 / Embedded Trust3 / Taking trust for granted is not a neutral option

Taking trust for granted is not a neutral option

February 28, 2015/in Embedded Trust /by Benjamin Tresham
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email

Trust is a wonderful thing when you have it. At times, though, we can grow complacent: we become so used to it just “being there”, that we forget what the world would like if it wasn’t. We forget about maintaining trust and, by the time we wake up to what has been going on, we may find ourselves seriously adrift.

Take smart meters – and the entirety of the smart grid project, now sputtering along in most of the world’s developed economies (and many of the developing ones too). The promise, by industry pundits and business analysts alike is that by installing equipment of greater and greater autonomy and intelligence into the homes of end-users, utilities will have more information and more control over how individuals use electricity.

Information and control leads to insight, leads to benefits on both sides of the equation: less need for expensive infrastructure investment by the power companies; lower costs and therefore lower bills for the consumer. You’d imagine that the public would welcome such a win-win situation with open arms. And you would be rightly puzzled by articles of the sort that have been appearing with increasing frequency which suggest that “a growing consumer backlash against new wireless digital technology for measuring power usage is slowing U.S. utilities’ $29 billion effort to upgrade their networks”.

http://bangordailynews.com/2012/05/13/business/consumer-opposition-to-smart-meters-slows-upgrade-of-national-grid/

That’s major investment not happening – and it is more than a minor glitch in the forward planning of utilities. The issue is trust. At the heart of smart grid development is quite a sophisticated bargain: consumers will, eventually, hand over data and control to external providers in return for a series of benefits that extend well beyond the financial, creating a greener future for all.

Still, there are issues. Pressure groups have pointed out that the installation of massive intelligent networks of the kind under consideration opens up massive security risks. Data can be stolen: systems hacked, with the result that the cyber-terrorist of the future could take over your TV remote. Or, more seriously, as temperatures drop to below freezing, turn off central heating and lock owners out from control of their own house.

Even if terrorists don’t manage this, there are concerns over privacy: the things that commercial organisations do with data every day. Losing it: abusing it; more generally doing things that they have neither right nor permission to do.

Nor is it just fringe consumer groups raising these issues. IT security experts have begun to say the same thing, adding weight to a growing chorus of dissatisfaction.

But the final straw appears to be the desire by many utilities for end-users to pay for the smart metering which, according to the industry hype, will eventually save the utilities themselves millions – billions, even – of dollars. While there may be a case for such an approach to major infrastructure investment, it is absolutely clear that utilities have failed to make it. Lobbying groups are having a field day. Plans are on hold across several states, as state legislatures look into the question of whether this is “fair” or not: elsewhere, utilities themselves are rethinking their options, waiting until they are sure they won’t be challenged before moving more cautiously forward again.

The situation is a mess. As reports suggest, major national investment – particularly in the United States – is now on hold for one simple reason: utilities took their customers for granted. They presumed that trust would always be there, while giving their customers little reason to trust them.

The resultant falling out goes much deeper than a simple difference of opinion. Without trust, real world plans must now be put on hold. Real costs incurred. Real savings deferred.

Taking trust for granted is not a neutral option.

  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Benjamin Tresham
Latest posts by Benjamin Tresham (see all)
  • Digital Personalisation – The Revolution is upon us! Integrating online and offline interactions - July 2, 2015
  • Digital Personalisation – The Revolution is upon us! Plotting the user Journey - June 29, 2015
  • Digital Personalisation – The Revolution is upon us! Part I, developing Personas - June 23, 2015
Tags: B2B Trust, Building Trust into your Customer Plans, Building Your Capability & Competency Framework, Business Case Development, Business Requirements Definition, Customer Centricity, Customer Proposition Development, Distributor Management & Development, Intermediary / Broker Management and Development, Key Account Management, Trust
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
http://customerattuned.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/logo-1.svg 0 0 Benjamin Tresham http://customerattuned.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/logo-1.svg Benjamin Tresham2015-02-28 16:00:102022-06-23 10:33:48Taking trust for granted is not a neutral option
You might also like
Trust – a small but enormously important word
CRM Steps for success – Part 1 of 7
Four key areas for developing a proposition for intermediated business
Are you suffering deep dependence with your B2B customers?
How to use Trust DNA™ for Business Development
Trust Ladder Part 3: Improving Performance

Customer Centricity Loop


Customer Attuned builds a culture of customer centricity based on B2B Trust so that sustainable, mutually beneficial and profitable relationships are maintained.

These service areas are interdependent: improve your Customer Strategy and your Organisational Performance improves, improve your Organisational Performance, and watch how Customer Strategy goals are met.

View Full Model

Other posts in ‘Embedded Trust’

  • Customer Centricity is More Important than Specialism
  • Why is Trust key in Financial Services?
  • The Trust Dividend – by Dr Mark Hollyoake – Press Feature
  • Building ‘Business-to- Business’ Trust At Operations Level. Part 3
  • The Trust Factor – Speaker Spotlight

or select a new blog category to view

 

 

 

building a culture of customer centricity based on B2B Trust

Let‘s chat!

© Copyright Customer Attuned, All rights reserved 2022    |    Website by ZeroDotNine
By using this website you consent to our use of cookies, for further information please refer to our privacy policy.
  • Privacy Policy
Rehabilitating the word ‘equitable’ in B2B customer relationshi...What B2B Industry Leaders are saying about Trust
Scroll to top